Category Archives: Politics

Facts are irrelevant in American politics, and this video proves it.

In this extended interview, CNN’s Anderson Cooper interviews Texas State Rep. Leo Berman, a Republican who’s offered a bill that would require presidential candidates to present their birth certificates to Texas’ Secretary of State.

And why is this crazy law important?

“This bill is necessary because we have a president whom the American people don’t know whether he was born in Kenya or some other place,” Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, said in reference to President Barack Obama and of House Bill 295. “If you are running for president or vice president, you’ve got to show here in Texas that you were born in the United States and the birth certificate is your proof.”

Anderson Cooper’s received a lot of praise for this clip, mainly from liberals and fans of schadenfreude. He’s incredibly well-prepared with documents and citations that refute all of Berman’s efforts to prove that there are any legitimate “questions” about Obama’s birthplace, citizenship and background.

I clicked into this video from my RSS feed. The headline was progressive link bait, something like, “Anderson Cooper Reduces Texas Birther to Jelly!” The only reasonable reaction: brew a fresh latte, angle my beret just so and settle into my angular Scandanavian chair to watch.

Yes, Anderson Cooper puts a rhetorical smackdown on Rep. Berman. If this were a high school debate, Berman’s mom would have sneaked out of the auditorium and pulled the fire alarm just to spare her baby the humiliation.

But this is politics in 2010, so Cooper has the dissonant task of propping Berman up so he can continue tearing him a new one while he refutes his guest’s tortured conspiracy theories and bad sourcing.

Where’s his birth certificate? In a safe.

Why won’t colleges release Obama’s school records? It’s against the law to do so.

Why did he violate a travel ban to Pakistan in the early 90s, I mean, 80s? There was no travel ban; like others, he received a 30-day visa.

It goes on like this for 12 minutes, a TV eternity. If you’re up on the facts (regardless of how you feel about Obama), you may develop a smidgen of sympathy for Berman. He was clearly expecting more deferential treatment from Cooper, and he starts to grow more uncomfortable as the interview draws on.

Cooper fills the screen with quotes from Hawaii state officials, images of Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth, a 1981 New York Times travel piece about Pakistan… it’s relentless, and after a time, ridiculous. For SNL’s parody, all they’ll need to add is the 8mm movie that Obama’s grandmother shot in the delivery room while Ed Sullivan blared on a TV in the background.

Berman never lets up, though he slows down. The man sticks to his guns but stops just short of stuffing his ears with Doublemint.

After watching, I understand why AC is our most crushed-on TV news personality; he never goes in for the kill — he just does trap-and-release:

COOPER: Sir, I don’t mean to contradict you.

BERMAN: I’m sorry?

COOPER: I — I respect you. And I respect, certainly, your service to this country, but where do you get your information? Because that — that — what you have just said is factually incorrect.

and later:

BERMAN: Oh, I don’t think most people have moved on.

I think either 50 percent — even CNN polls have shown that 50 to 60 percent of the people of the United States do not believe that the president is eligible to be holding that office.

COOPER: Sir, again, I’m sorry to — to keep…

BERMAN: That’s your own CNN poll, isn’t it?

COOPER: All right, sir, OK, I have the CNN poll right here.

I hate to — I hate to keep reading this. The CNN poll from July 16-21, all Americans, question, was Barack Obama born in the U.S.? The number of Americans who said definitely or probably, the percentage was 71 percent, definitely or probably no, 27 percent.

So, according to this poll, if you believe this poll, 71 percent of Americans believe probably or definitely that Barack Obama was born in the United States.

By this point in the interview, liberals see little blue birdies and stars orbiting Berman’s head. There’s more:

COOPER: But how much of this is about — purely about politics? Because, look, you — you — you are a good person, and you have served your country remarkably in the military, and you’re a public servant now.

It’s extremely satisfying to see a TV person fact-check a guest in real time, but my concurrent thought was, “why the hell is this the exception and not the freaking rule?” I loved watching “60 Minutes” when I was a kid because Ed Bradley and Morley Safer were so righteous. If they thought you were feeding them bullshit, they let you know, cameras rolling. Instead, Cooper reminds us (and Berman) that this politician is kind to dogs, children and old people. Hard to picture Murrow or Cronkite suffering a fool so gladly.

Back to my original point: I thought Berman seemed only slightly deflated at interview’s end. He didn’t respond directly to any points raised because he knew he didn’t have to. Berman will go on as many TV shows as he likes to spout his discredited beliefs — and the talking heads will treat him with lovingkindness.

Because the facts are irrelevant, or at best, secondary to Republican arguments. The progressive media spends most of its ammo refuting GOP talking points. American liberals are always trying to explain things and be so reasonable.

And that’s why they lose.

CNN Transcript is here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Media, Politics

Ball of Confusion.

It’s been a long day and there’s a lot on my mind.

The oil spill. That mural in Prescott. That retrograde racist GOP flack in South Carolina.

In Arizona, my father’s minister received a letter from the bishop asking her to lead her flock in a prayer for people negatively impacted by the “papers, please” law. As the law’s popular, she declined to open that particular can of worms. So my father, a lay speaker, asked the congregation to pray for those affected by SB 1070 and for greater understanding. I’m really proud of you, Dad.

As my father and I talked, I shared my concerns about the race-baiting that’s surfaced since Obama’s election. “I don’t think I’ve ever heard politicians speak like this,” I said.

“You haven’t,” he said. “To me, it sounds like 1961 or 1958. I haven’t heard politicians talk like this in your lifetime.”

As I said, it’s been a long day; but I had to express some anger and frustration somehow before pushing away for the rest of the evening. The clip below captures as much of the zeitgeist as I can take in from this vantage.


The Temptations, “The Smokey Robinson Show,” 12/18/70

1 Comment

Filed under Media, Politics

I’m a San Francisco radical.

After speaking with a friend, I realized that I’m not as cynical as I thought.

“You’re not cynical; you’re radical,” he said.

To his mind, a cynic sees the world with a sour, sometimes bitter sense of potential. A radical sees things as they actually are.

I understand his viewpoint. If Katie Couric told America that BP and the government are deliberately misleading us about the extent of the oil spill, she’d be marginalized immediately and accused of bias.

If a Fox News guest said sympathetically that Glenn Beck exhibits bipolar symptoms and is in need of an intervention, Bill O’Reilly might well cut their mike and accuse them of making scandalous personal insults.

It’s an interesting frame of thought to follow; The Daily Show and Colbert Report aren’t snarky commentary on current events — they peel back the veneer that most news organizations wax and polish. Olbermann and Maddow are obviously liberal, but in terms of the topics covered and the guests who appear, they’re fairly radical.

Who else on television speaks as plainly about race as Melissa Harris-Lacewell? Before the last election, I felt a sense of relief each time I heard John Dean and Jonathan Turley enumerate the letter of which laws Bush-Cheney had violated earlier that day. It let me know I wasn’t going crazy, because they knew and I knew they’d never be held accountable.

The “liberal news media” trope is successfully spread by people who cater to the faith-based community. “Faith-based” isn’t a religious term; it aptly describes hucksters like Fox News, Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber who ignore facts in favor of their feelings. Conservatives’ actions and principles seem like they’re largely driven by emotion and not reason. For example, people make fun of and complain about San Francisco’s ban on plastic bags or our minimum wage but logically, these policies simply work.

Perhaps this anecdote will tie this post together: I visited East Texas a few months ago and spent a few days getting to know some great people, including a 9-year-old girl. She listened to adult conversation with great interest. One evening after a pause at dinner, she asked, “What does ‘feminist’ mean?'”

I thought about it for a moment. “Well, a feminist is a woman who feel that she’s entitled to the same things a man can have, you know — an equal chance. And they’re independent. Some feminists don’t change their last name when they get married, for example.”

“Really?” she said. “Feminist. I like that.”

“Okay, sweetie; use it in a sentence,” said her father.

She dug into her ice cream sundae with gusto. “When I grow up and get married and have kids, I’m gonna keep my last name, because I’m a feminist.” She then stuffed her mouth with fudge and whipped cream.

Look out, East Texas.

Leave a comment

Filed under Media, Politics