Monthly Archives: May 2010

“Sleep, Angel”

I wrote this 5-page scene for the Creative Screenwriting 2009 Cyberspace Open. It was a time-based writing competition in which contestants had 48 hours to write a 5-page scene based on a premise offered by the judges.

I worked pretty hard on the entry, but scored only an 89; a score of 91 or higher was required to move on to the next round. Looking back, this was an okay piece, but it’s not my best work. I’m posting it more so that any interest readers can see the change between this and successive scenes.

Here’s the entry I received for the Fall 2009 Contest:

Your PROTAGONIST’S allies have turned on him (or her.) His reputation is now in tatters, largely due to his own screw-up — which has been magnified and broadcast by the ANTAGONIST. Write the scene in which the protagonist tries to win the allies back. The scene should include a heartfelt mea culpa. You may use any setting, era or characters in addition to the ones indicated, as needed.

Here’s the scene:

FADE IN:

INT. NORTHPORT PD INTERROGATION ROOM – NIGHT

TED WARMS (43,) slumps in a chair. His left wrist is shackled to a thick plate bolted to the dented table top. In bare feet, he wears a bathrobe, pajama bottoms and a T-shirt with the Dalai Lama’s serene face. His right hand fiddles with a salt-and-pepper ponytail.

He sits up straight when the door opens to admit ERNIE ASTORIA (56,) a burly man who clearly loves to smile, and PATTY CAIN (35,) a curvy, petite woman who does not. Astoria carries a large brown bag, they both wear detectives’ badges. Astoria sits as Patty observes her reflection in the two-way glass.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Screenwriting

1927 Paramount map of CA shooting locations

Paramount CA Location map, 1927If anyone knows where I can get a poster-sized copy, let me know.

Like This!

Leave a comment

Filed under California

Google Reader privacy preferences: good step in the right direction.

I recently logged into my Google Reader a few minutes ago and was greeted with the following pop-up message:

As you can see, it asked whether I wanted to change my privacy preferences in clear language and described the consequences associated with each action.  It doesn’t describe the process for changing my settings, it directly enables me to do so.

I’ve slammed Google in the past for failing to respect privacy concerns, but this is a good step in the right direction.  It doesn’t obviate the user-side failure that attended the debut of Google Buzz, but it demonstrates that they’ve been listening, as opposed to (only) playing damage control.

I hope Facebook is paying attention, but I doubt that they are. Based on my experience, companies at this stage are insular and inward-looking. They reason that everyone else is out to take them down because they’ve been successful — as a result, they don’t need to change, they simply need to present the illusion that they’re being responsive.  Union Carbide took this tack after Bhopal, Morton-Thiokol did it during the Challenger disaster, and British Petroleum is doing it right now.

I’m only referring to the corporate responses; Facebook’s weak privacy protocols haven’t killed anyone (yet), but they’re redefining the definition of public and private to suit their business needs.  The only reason they’ve been allowed to play this game is because of a lack of case law regarding the protection of personally identifiable information.

Which is entirely our fault.

Like This!

Leave a comment

Filed under Internet, Social Media, Uncategorized