Crimes Of Yesteryear: Butcher Butchered In Grisly 1913 Inner Sunset Slaying

Hoodline, 3/14/15

lincoln9th

Lincoln and 9th Ave. in 1929 (via San Francisco History Center, SFPL)

Even a century ago, the Inner Sunset was regarded as a generally quiet neighborhood where crimes were more likely to committed against property than people. As seen in the 1929 photo of Lincoln Way and 9th Avenue above, the area saw relatively little through traffic, and was a sleepy hamlet compared to the city’s hustle and bustle to the east.

But in 1913, one of the area’s goriest homicides occurred when a butcher was savagely murdered in his shop at 1254 9th Ave.

San Francisco Call, 5/17/13

On the evening of May 14th, the wife of butcher Egbert Annand brought her baby along to visit Clancy & Mueller, the grocery next to her husband’s shop on 9th between H and I Streets (later Lincoln Way and Irving Street). According to the San Francisco Call, Annand had come home for lunch and left “in his usual good spirits,” so when he failed to return for dinner, Mrs. Annand visited Mr. and Mrs. Clancy, “who sought to allay the distracted wife’s fears.”

At 8pm, Eugene Mueller, co-owner of the grocery store, entered the butcher shop after finding the door ajar. At the rear of the store, Mueller and friends came across Annand, whose “head was almost severed from his body,” reported the Call. About $275 in cash was missing, and a bloody knife was discovered under newspapers and bloody rags. Investigators determined that the door that separated the back room from the front of the shop had been “taken from its hinges and washed.”

1913 telephone directory

Suspicion fell immediately on Walter Scott, Annand’s 22-year-old delivery boy.

According to Louis Walters, a 15-year-old who also made butcher deliveries, Annand hadn’t been seen since lunchtime. At 5:30pm, Scott and Walters “took Annand’s machine” to Lincoln and 3rd for a delivery. At that point, Scott left Walters alone; when he returned, he “gave the youngster a dime and disappeared.”

When Scott was arrested and police discovered his bloody clothes in a garbage can, he gave officials “many conflicting stories.” Scott said he witnessed Annand’s suicide but chose not to report it for fear that he would be accused. During his July trial, Scott “was unable to explain … a number of inconsistencies.”

San Francisco Call, 7/17/13

The defense argued that Annand committed suicide because he was despondent over his failing new business. Unfortunately for Scott, the butcher shop had been “prosperous” since it opened, the victim suffered stab wounds to the back and “the palms of his hands were slashed to the bone,” suggesting defensive wounds.

On July 23rd, it took the jury a little more than an hour to return a guilty verdict of murder in the first degree. Scott was sentenced to a life term in San Quentin on July 25th.

The butcher shop appears to have closed, as it doesn’t appear in any phone directories in 1914.

Today, Annand’s butcher shop would occupy a space between a 3-story apartment building at number 1250 and Alaya Boutique at 1256 9th Ave.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under History, Inner Sunset, San Francisco

Meet New Yorker Cover Artist And Cole Valley Local Mark Ulriksen

Hoodline, 3/11/15

markulriksen

Mark Ulriksen is a Cole Valley-based artist whose work has appeared on the cover of The New Yorker 48 times since 1994. Beyond magazines, Ulriksen has created a large body of work for clients such as major ad agencies, publishers, universities, and well as global brands like Nike and United Airlines. His work has been collected by The Smithsonian, Martin Scorcese and Jimmy Buffet, and in 2006, the Magazine Publishers of America awarded him top news magazine cover.

Hoodline recently sat down with Ulriksen to learn more about his career, recent projects and how art and illustration are adapting for digital media.

Is there one magazine cover that you’re most proud of?

“That’s a tough question. I’m still a big fan of a New Yorker cover about society’s obsession with staring at phones, so I’d say this “Capturing the Memories” cover is one of my favorites. But I really don’t have one single choice. Tomorrow I may say something different.”

Courtesy Mark Ulriksen

You’ve worked with magazines for much of your career. Do you perceive more opportunities or fewer for artists since publishers have gone digital?

“Definitely the environment for editorial illustration has changed for the worse for illustrators. There are fewer ad dollars going to periodicals, which means fewer pages and fewer opportunities. Plus photography has always been more prevalent than illustration. The marketplace also seems to favor computer generated images these days as opposed to paintings such as what I do. Like any ephemeral field tastes and fashions come and go, but the digital shakeup is here to stay.”

Similarly, what are your thoughts about 7×7 magazine’s decision to go digital-only?

“Frankly. I wasn’t aware of that development … Good news for trees.”

What do you think of Uber’s recent decision to publish a quarterly magazine for its drivers?

“I’m guessing Uber could use some good press for a change so they’ll create their own. The old dividing line between editorial content driven by publishers versus that created by corporations is constantly being blurred. A magazine for Uber’s drivers sounds more like a company brochure than something aimed at consumers.”

Private commissions seem to comprise a lot of the work you do. How do people find you when it comes to something like a mural or a portrait?

“Private commission requests come from all sorts of places, from folks I know personally to people who are already familiar with my work or have stumbled across it. I’d have to thank Google for a lot of it. Plus in this day and age any artist has to constantly have an online presence so a lot of my time is spent marketing myself, which I really dislike doing.”

What was your first reaction when you learned that you were being awarded top magazine news cover by the Magazine Publishers of America?

“Probably some combination of shock and awe. I didn’t even know of the competition so it was quite a pleasant surprise.”

Of the awards and accolades you’ve received, which one means the most to you?

“Being a regular contributor to The New Yorker means the most to me. There aren’t many places where your work isn’t art directed, is seen by over a million people and is unmarred by cover lines and other text.

Have you created any public art in Cole Valley or San Francisco?

“Nothing for my neighborhood but I was one of three artists annually selected by the SF Arts Commissions Art on Market Street Program, where I had six posters up along Market Street for three months back in late 2013. My series was titled ‘Active San Francisco.'”

How did your last book, Dogs Rule Nonchalantly, come about? 

“I had collected about a hundred-and-some dog pictures I painted over the last 20 years. I laid them all out and thought, ‘How can I tell a story around them?’ I’d done an article for The Atlantic Monthly about 15 years ago about how dogs were so smart, they controlled humans. They get what they want, but they do it in a really nonchalant way.”

Day to day, what are you working on now?

“I’ve got to send out a Kickstarter portrait, just finished it up last night and have to send that off, I have to pick up a print from the printer for a client who bought a bunch of prints, I’m about to send off this painting here (gestures at an oversized New Yorker magazine cover).

“This was a request by Neil deGrasse Tyson, the astrophysicist. He wanted to have this seven feet high, but my original painting for the New Yorker was 12 by 16 [inches], so I said, ‘You can’t blow up that painting to seven feet, it’ll look terrible. I need to do a new painting for you, bigger. I’ve already done a 7-foot-high canvas print from this painting.”

Mark Ulriksen’s latest book, Dogs Rule Nonchalantly, is available online and in stores. For more information, visit Mark’s Facebook page or follow him on Twitter.

Leave a comment

Filed under Inner Sunset, San Francisco, Uncategorized

San Francisco’s Earthquake Shacks: Real Estate Deal Of The Century

Hoodline, 3/9/15

refugee5

Approximately 75,000 people left San Francisco after the April 1906 earthquake and fire, but about 20,000 hardy souls who stayed moved into makeshift housing created across 26 refugee camps—city parks that were transformed into tent cities. As the city rebuilt, these temporary structures were sold to private owners; a well-preserved specimen remains in the Inner Sunset on 10th Ave.

San Francisco Call, 5/24/1906

Rebuilding began as soon as the last fires were extinguished, but early housing demand far exceeded the supply. Although refugee camps started to close by the summer of 1906, thousands were left in canvas tents with winter approaching. To avoid another housing crisis, relief officials designed a more durable shelter that could be made from local materials.

Funded by the San Francisco Relief Corporation and managed by the Parks Commission, earthquake shacks came in three sizes and cost anywhere from $100 to $742 in labor and materials. According to the Western Neighborhoods Project, union carpenters built about 5,600 cottages in three sizes. Decked out in olive drab paint (more Army surplus), earthquake shacks were rented out for $2 to $6 per month.

San Francisco Call, 1/6/1907

At peak occupancy, 16,448 San Franciscans lived in earthquake shacks, which could be purchased for $50. The May 24, 1906 edition of the San Francisco Call declared that “Refugees May Remain as Long as They Are Without Homes,” but a January 6, 1907 headline, “Single Men Must Leave Parks,” suggests that officials were eager to resettle refugees in neighborhoods.

Even for the era, $50 was a sweet deal for a free-standing home, even if it had to moved at the owner’s expense. The structures were built from fir, redwood and cedar and were so durable, they could be hoisted by their roofs and transported by cart.

courtesy Bancroft Library

The earthquake shack at 1842 10th Ave. is one of approximately 100 that remain in the city. Since it was relocated from one of the city’s refugee camps in 1908, it’s been remodeled to include two bathrooms and expanded to 920 square feet with two bedrooms. The front yard has a garden area and is enclosed by bamboo and a privacy fence.

Boasting a living room fireplace and a large unfinished attic, Zillow reports that the property last sold for $509,000 in March 2009. Today’s estimated value is $960,000, giving this dwelling a nearly 20,000-fold increase in value.

Leave a comment

Filed under History, Inner Sunset, San Francisco